Reply to "Comment on 'Gravitational Pair Production and Black Hole Evaporation'"
Michael F. Wondrak, Walter D. van Suijlekom, Heino Falcke

TL;DR
This paper defends a previous unified derivation of black hole radiation effects, clarifying misconceptions and emphasizing the robustness of the original results despite critiques.
Contribution
It responds to critiques by clarifying the validity of the original derivation of black hole pair production and Hawking radiation effects.
Findings
The original derivation remains valid despite critiques.
Local tidal forces are key to black hole radiation.
The effective action approach is robust.
Abstract
In a recent letter, the authors presented a unified derivation of the electric Schwinger effect and a generalized Hawking effect with an additional radiation component. The approach discloses a radial profile of black hole pair production and traces the emission back to local tidal forces which are independent of the black hole event horizon. It uses an effective action valid to second order in curvature and arbitrary order in proper time. A comment on the letter supposed two inconsistencies when applying the central formula to the Schwinger effect in the presence of magnetic fields. The present letter points out that the partially flawed argumentation does not cast doubt on the results.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCosmology and Gravitation Theories · Relativity and Gravitational Theory · Experimental and Theoretical Physics Studies
