TL;DR
This paper evaluates non-linear regression models, especially Gaussian Process Regression, for climate data emulation using ClimateBench v1.0, highlighting their performance and computational trade-offs to improve climate modeling efficiency.
Contribution
It compares the emulation capabilities of three non-linear regression models on ClimateBench, identifying Gaussian Process Regression as the top performer and exploring enhancements like composite kernels.
Findings
Gaussian Process Regressor outperforms others in emulation accuracy
Support Vector and Kernel Ridge models offer competitive results
Trade-offs exist between model performance and computational resources
Abstract
Climate projections using data driven machine learning models acting as emulators, is one of the prevailing areas of research to enable policy makers make informed decisions. Use of machine learning emulators as surrogates for computationally heavy GCM simulators reduces time and carbon footprints. In this direction, ClimateBench [1] is a recently curated benchmarking dataset for evaluating the performance of machine learning emulators designed for climate data. Recent studies have reported that despite being considered fundamental, regression models offer several advantages pertaining to climate emulations. In particular, by leveraging the kernel trick, regression models can capture complex relationships and improve their predictive capabilities. This study focuses on evaluating non-linear regression models using the aforementioned dataset. Specifically, we compare the emulation…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsGaussian Process · Variational Inference
