Constraints on Interstellar Sovereignty
Jacob Haqq-Misra

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the physical, legal, and political constraints on establishing sovereignty in space, proposing a three-prong test to evaluate governance models for interstellar missions and emphasizing the importance of sustainability and legal frameworks.
Contribution
It synthesizes physical, legal, and political factors affecting space sovereignty and introduces a three-prong viability test for interstellar governance models.
Findings
Outer Space Treaty limits territorial expansion but allows jurisdiction extension
Historical precedent suggests new space treaties may face challenges
Environmental constraints require technical, political, and sustainability considerations
Abstract
Human space exploration and settlement of other planets is becoming increasingly technologically feasible, while mission concepts for remote and crewed missions to nearby star systems continue to be developed. But the long-term success of space settlement also requires extensions and advances in models of governance. This paper provides a synthesis of the physical factors that will constrain the application of sovereignty in space as well as legal precedent on Earth that likely applies to any crewed or uncrewed missions to other stellar systems. The Outer Space Treaty limits the territorial expansion of states into space, but the requirements for oversight of nongovernmental agencies and retention of property ownership enable the extension of state jurisdiction into space. Pragmatic constraints from historical precedent on Earth suggest that new space treaties will be unlikely to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSpace exploration and regulation · Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
