Looking for a needle in a haystack: Measuring the length of a stellar bar

TL;DR

This study systematically compares various methods for measuring the length of stellar bars in galaxies using N-body simulations, revealing biases and correlations among estimators and discussing implications for classifying bar speeds.

Contribution

It provides a comprehensive analysis of the robustness and accuracy of different bar length estimators in simulated galaxy models, highlighting their limitations and correlations.

Findings

Fourier-based estimators overestimate bar length in the presence of spirals.

Dark-gap strength correlates with bar length during rapid growth phases.

Isophotal analysis systematically overestimates bar length.

Abstract

One of the challenges related to stellar bars is to accurately determine the length of the bar in a disc galaxy. In the literature, a wide variety of methods have been employed to measure the extent of a bar. However, a systematic study on determining the robustness and accuracy of different bar length estimators is still beyond our grasp. Here, we investigate the accuracy and the correlation (if any) between different bar length measurement methods while using an N-body model of a barred galaxy, where the bar evolves self-consistently in the presence of a live dark matter halo. We investigate the temporal evolution of the bar length, using different estimators (involving isophotal analysis of de-projected surface brightness distribution and Fourier decomposition of surface density), and we study their robustness and accuracy. We made further attempts to determine correlations among any two of these bar length estimators used here. In the presence of spirals, the bar length estimators that only consider the amplitudes of different Fourier moments (and do not take into account the phase-angle of m=2 Fourier moment) systematically overestimate the length of the bar. The strength of dark-gaps (produced by bars) is strongly correlated with the bar length in early rapid growth phase and is only weakly anti-correlated during subsequent quiescent phase of bar evolution. However, the location of dark-gaps is only weakly correlated to the bar length, hence, this information cannot be used as a robust proxy for determining the bar length. In addition, the bar length estimators, obtained using isophotal analysis of de-projected surface brightness distribution, systematically overestimate the bar length. The implications of bar length over(under)estimation in the context of determining fast and slow bars are further discussed in this work.