On the comparison between pre- and post-surgery nasal anatomies via computational fluid dynamics

TL;DR

This study evaluates how different simulation constraints affect the comparison of pre- and post-surgery nasal anatomies using CFD, highlighting the importance of choosing appropriate boundary conditions for accurate diagnosis and surgical planning.

Contribution

It introduces a systematic approach to compare nasal anatomies under various flow constraints, revealing the impact of boundary condition choices on CFD-based assessments.

Findings

Flow forcing type significantly influences comparison results.

Constant pressure drop is less suitable for nasal CFD analysis.

CFR and CPI provide more consistent comparisons.

Abstract

Nasal breathing difficulties (NBD) are widespread and difficult to diagnose; the failure rate of their surgical corrections is high. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) enables diagnosis of NBD and surgery planning, by comparing a pre-operative (pre-op) situation with the outcome of virtual surgery (post-op). An equivalent comparison is involved when considering distinct anatomies in the search for the functionally normal nose. Currently, this comparison is carried out in more than one way, under the implicit assumption that results are unchanged, which reflects our limited understanding of the driver of the respiratory function. The study describes how to set up a meaningful comparison. A pre-op anatomy, derived via segmentation from a CT scan, is compared with a post-op anatomy obtained via virtual surgery. State-of-the-art numerical simulations for a steady inspiration carry out the comparison under three types of global constraints, derived from the field of turbulent flow control: a constant pressure drop (CPG) between external ambient and throat, a constant flow rate (CFR) through the airways and a constant power input (CPI) from the lungs can be enforced. A significant difference in the quantities of interest is observed depending on the type of comparison. Global quantities (flow rate, pressure drop, nasal resistance) as well as local ones are affected. The type of flow forcing affects the outcome of the comparison between pre-op and post-op anatomies. Among the three available options, we argue that CPG is the least adequate. Arguments favouring either CFR or CPI are presented.