Elementary Proofs of Congruences for POND and PEND Partitions
James A. Sellers

TL;DR
This paper proves elementary Ramanujan-like congruences for POND and PEND partitions, which are variants of POD and PED partitions with specific restrictions on odd and even parts.
Contribution
It introduces new congruences for POND and PEND partitions and provides elementary proofs using classical q-series identities and induction.
Findings
Established infinite families of Ramanujan-like congruences modulo 3.
Provided elementary proofs relying on q-series identities.
Extended understanding of partition classes with odd/even part restrictions.
Abstract
Recently, Ballantine and Welch considered various generalizations and refinements of POD and PED partitions. These are integer partitions wherein the odd parts must be distinct (in the case of POD partitions) or the even parts must be distinct (in the case of PED partitions). In the process, they were led to consider two classes of integer partitions which are, in some sense, the ``opposite'' of POD and PED partitions. They labeled these POND and PEND partitions, which are integer partitions wherein the odd parts cannot be distinct (in the case of POND partitions) or the even parts cannot be distinct (in the case of PEND partitions). In this work, we study these two types of partitions from an arithmetic perspective. Along the way, we are led to prove the following two infinite families of Ramanujan--like congruences: For all and all \begin{align*}…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Mathematical Identities · Analytic Number Theory Research · Mathematical functions and polynomials
