TL;DR
This paper investigates how individual algorithmic recourse actions can influence the broader system dynamics, revealing potential negative effects and proposing mitigation strategies through simulation experiments.
Contribution
It introduces a generalized framework for analyzing recourse dynamics and highlights the external costs and systemic shifts caused by individual recourse actions.
Findings
Substantial domain and model shifts due to recourse actions
Existing methods do not account for endogenous dynamics
Mitigation strategies can reduce negative systemic effects
Abstract
Existing work on Counterfactual Explanations (CE) and Algorithmic Recourse (AR) has largely focused on single individuals in a static environment: given some estimated model, the goal is to find valid counterfactuals for an individual instance that fulfill various desiderata. The ability of such counterfactuals to handle dynamics like data and model drift remains a largely unexplored research challenge. There has also been surprisingly little work on the related question of how the actual implementation of recourse by one individual may affect other individuals. Through this work, we aim to close that gap. We first show that many of the existing methodologies can be collectively described by a generalized framework. We then argue that the existing framework does not account for a hidden external cost of recourse, that only reveals itself when studying the endogenous dynamics of recourse…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsCounterfactuals Explanations
