Improved test-retest reliability of $\textit{R}_2^*$ and susceptibility quantification using multi-shot multi echo 3D EPI

TL;DR

This study demonstrates that multi-shot multi-echo 3D EPI improves test-retest reliability and maintains accuracy in quantifying $R_2^*$ and susceptibility, offering a faster alternative to conventional GRE MRI.

Contribution

The paper introduces the use of multi-shot multi-echo 3D EPI for $T_2^*$ and susceptibility quantification, showing enhanced reliability over traditional GRE methods.

Findings

EPI protocols showed increased test-retest reliability.

Results were consistent between EPI and GRE methods.

EPI reduced scan time while maintaining accuracy.

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the potential of 3D echo-planar imaging (EPI) for improving the reliability of $T_2^*$-weighted ($T_2^*w$) data and quantification of $\textit{R}_2^*$ decay rate and susceptibility ($\chi$) compared to conventional gradient echo (GRE)-based acquisition. Eight healthy subjects in a wide age range were recruited. Each subject received repeated scans for both GRE and EPI acquisitions with an isotropic 1 mm resolution at 3 T. Maps of $\textit{R}_2^*$ and $\chi$ were quantified and compared using their inter-scan difference to evaluate the test-retest reliability. Inter-protocol differences of $\textit{R}_2^*$ and $\chi$ between GRE and EPI were also measured voxel by voxel and in selected ROIs to test the consistency between the two acquisition methods. The quantifications of $\textit{R}_2^*$ and $\chi$ using EPI protocols showed increased test-retest reliability with higher EPI factors up to 5 as performed in the experiment and were consistent with those based on GRE. This result suggested multi-shot multi-echo 3D EPI can be a useful alternative acquisition method for $T_2^*w$ MRI and quantification of $\textit{R}_2^*$ and $\chi$ with reduced scan time, improved test-retest reliability and similar accuracy compared to commonly used 3D GRE.