Bayesian inference of vorticity in unbounded flow from limited pressure measurements

TL;DR

This paper develops a Bayesian method to infer vortex positions and strengths in unbounded flows from limited pressure data, addressing ill-posedness and uncertainty in the inverse problem.

Contribution

It introduces a Bayesian vortex estimator using MCMC and Gaussian mixtures to quantify uncertainty and handle multiple solutions in vortex flow inference.

Findings

Fewer sensors than vortex states lead to a manifold of solutions.

One more sensor than states yields unique solutions without rank deficiency.

Uncertainty increases with vortex distance from sensors.

Abstract

We study the instantaneous inference of an unbounded planar flow from sparse noisy pressure measurements. The true flow field comprises one or more regularized point vortices of various strength and size. We interpret the true flow's measurements with a vortex estimator, also consisting of regularized vortices, and attempt to infer the positions and strengths of this estimator assuming little prior knowledge. The problem often has several possible solutions, many due to a variety of symmetries. To deal with this ill-posedness and to quantify the uncertainty, we develop the vortex estimator in a Bayesian setting. We use Markov-chain Monte Carlo and a Gaussian mixture model to sample and categorize the probable vortex states in the posterior distribution, tailoring the prior to avoid spurious solutions. Through experiments with one or more true vortices, we reveal many aspects of the vortex inference problem. With fewer sensors than states, the estimator infers a manifold of equally-possible states. Using one more sensor than states ensures that no cases of rank deficiency arise. Uncertainty grows rapidly with distance when a vortex lies outside of the vicinity of the sensors. Vortex size cannot be reliably inferred, but the position and strength of a larger vortex can be estimated with a much smaller one. In estimates of multiple vortices their individual signs are discernible because of the non-linear coupling in the pressure. When the true vortex state is inferred from an estimator of fewer vortices, the estimate approximately aggregates the true vortices where possible.