A clarification on prevailing misconceptions in unimodular gravity
Gabriel R. Bengochea, Gabriel Leon, Alejandro Perez, Daniel, Sudarsky

TL;DR
This paper clarifies common misconceptions about Unimodular Gravity, especially regarding its symmetry properties and solution space, correcting false claims about metric restrictions and gauge choices in cosmological perturbation theory.
Contribution
It provides a clear explanation of the true nature of diffeomorphism invariance in Unimodular Gravity, correcting widespread misunderstandings in the literature.
Findings
Unimodular Gravity is invariant under volume-preserving diffeomorphisms, not all diffeomorphisms.
Incorrect claims about metric restrictions like |det g|=1 are addressed.
Misconceptions about gauge restrictions in cosmological perturbation theory are clarified.
Abstract
The traditional presentation of Unimodular Gravity (UG) consists on indicating that it is an alternative theory of gravity that restricts the generic diffeomorphism invariance of General Relativity. In particular, as often encountered in the literature, unlike General Relativity, Unimodular Gravity is invariant solely under volume-preserving diffeomorphisms. That characterization of UG has led to some confusion and incorrect statements in various treatments on the subject. For instance, sometimes it is claimed (mistakenly) that only spacetime metrics such that det can be considered as valid solutions of the theory. Additionally, that same (incorrect) statement is often invoked to argue that some particular gauges (e.g. the Newtonian or synchronous gauge) are not allowed when dealing with cosmological perturbation theory in UG. The present article is devoted to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
