Age-Stratified Differences in Morphological Connectivity Patterns in ASD: An sMRI and Machine Learning Approach

TL;DR

This study compares age-specific morphological features from sMRI data to classify ASD using machine learning, finding that younger age groups, especially 6-11 years, yield higher classification accuracy.

Contribution

It introduces an age-stratified analysis of morphological connectivity features for ASD classification, highlighting the importance of age-specific models.

Findings

Highest classification performance in 6-11 age group

Morphological connectivity features outperform traditional features in young children

Age-specific models improve ASD diagnostic accuracy

Abstract

Purpose: Age biases have been identified as an essential factor in the diagnosis of ASD. The objective of this study was to compare the effect of different age groups in classifying ASD using morphological features (MF) and morphological connectivity features (MCF). Methods: The structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) data for the study was obtained from the two publicly available databases, ABIDE-I and ABIDE-II. We considered three age groups, 6 to 11, 11 to 18, and 6 to 18, for our analysis. The sMRI data was pre-processed using a standard pipeline and was then parcellated into 148 different regions according to the Destrieux atlas. The area, thickness, volume, and mean curvature information was then extracted for each region which was used to create a total of 592 MF and 10,878 MCF for each subject. Significant features were identified using a statistical t-test (p<0.05) which was then used to train a random forest (RF) classifier. Results: The results of our study suggested that the performance of the 6 to 11 age group was the highest, followed by the 6 to 18 and 11 to 18 ages in both MF and MCF. Overall, the MCF with RF in the 6 to 11 age group performed better in the classification than the other groups and produced an accuracy, F1 score, recall, and precision of 75.8%, 83.1%, 86%, and 80.4%, respectively. Conclusion: Our study thus demonstrates that morphological connectivity and age-related diagnostic model could be an effective approach to discriminating ASD.