Comment on `Painlev\'e Integrability and Multi-wave pattern for (2+1) dimensional Long wave-Short wave Resonance Interaction system'
R. Radha, C. Senthil Kumar

TL;DR
This paper critically examines claims of integrability and solutions for a (2+1)D long wave-short wave resonance system, demonstrating it is non-integrable and highlighting inconsistencies in previous work.
Contribution
It provides a rigorous analysis showing the system's non-integrability and corrects misconceptions in prior studies regarding its solutions and properties.
Findings
The system does not pass Painlevé test, indicating non-integrability.
Previous solutions do not satisfy the original equations.
Claims of lumps and dromions are inconsistent with definitions.
Abstract
In the paper by Sivatharani et al [1], the authors make a tall claim about the integrability of a 2 component (2+1) dimensional Long wave Short wave Resonance Interaction (2C(2+1)LSRI) equation with mixed sign which was already claimed to be non integrable and hence known not to satisfy Painlev\'e [2] property which the authors show to pass Painlev\'e test. We have categorically shown how the system does not pass Painlev\'e test and hence non-integrable reinforcing the claim made by Maruno et al [2]. The authors claim to derive the solutions of 2C(2+1)LSRI equation which ironically do not satisfy the equation. To top it all, the authors claim to have generated lumps and dromions which again defy their very own definition.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Mathematical Physics Problems · Nonlinear Photonic Systems · Nonlinear Waves and Solitons
