Improved dimension dependence in the Bernstein von Mises Theorem via a new Laplace approximation bound
Anya Katsevich

TL;DR
This paper improves the understanding of high-dimensional Bayesian asymptotics by establishing that the Bernstein-von Mises theorem holds under milder conditions, specifically when the sample size grows faster than the square of the dimension, using a new Laplace approximation bound.
Contribution
The paper introduces a new explicit Laplace approximation bound that reduces the sample size requirement for the Bernstein-von Mises theorem from cubic to quadratic in the dimension.
Findings
BvM holds when n ≫ d² in generalized linear models and multinomial data.
Improves previous condition n ≫ d³ for posterior normality.
Provides nonasymptotic, high-probability bounds for the BvM.
Abstract
The Bernstein-von Mises theorem (BvM) gives conditions under which the posterior distribution of a parameter based on independent samples is asymptotically normal. In the high-dimensional regime, a key question is to determine the growth rate of with required for the BvM to hold. We show that up to a model-dependent coefficient, suffices for the BvM to hold in two settings: arbitrary generalized linear models, which include exponential families as a special case, and multinomial data, in which the parameter of interest is an unknown probability mass functions on states. Our results improve on the tightest previously known condition for posterior asymptotic normality, . Our statements of the BvM are nonasymptotic, taking the form of explicit high-probability bounds. To prove the BvM, we derive a new simple and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Methods and Inference · Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods · Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
