Dialogue Possibilities between a Human Supervisor and UAM Air Traffic Management: Route Alteration
Jeongseok Kim, Kangjin Kim

TL;DR
This paper presents a knowledge-based reasoning approach for UAM air traffic route detours, enabling safe, efficient, and human-in-the-loop route management through Answer Set Programming.
Contribution
It introduces a novel non-monotonic reasoning method for UAM detour management that integrates human supervisor input with AI techniques.
Findings
Validated through simulation scenarios
Effective in identifying safe detours
Enhances human-AI collaboration in UATM
Abstract
This paper introduces a novel approach to detour management in Urban Air Traffic Management (UATM) using knowledge representation and reasoning. It aims to understand the complexities and requirements of UAM detours, enabling a method that quickly identifies safe and efficient routes in a carefully sampled environment. This method implemented in Answer Set Programming uses non-monotonic reasoning and a two-phase conversation between a human manager and the UATM system, considering factors like safety and potential impacts. The robustness and efficacy of the proposed method were validated through several queries from two simulation scenarios, contributing to the symbiosis of human knowledge and advanced AI techniques. The paper provides an introduction, citing relevant studies, problem formulation, solution, discussions, and concluding comments.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMulti-Agent Systems and Negotiation · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Air Traffic Management and Optimization
