Towards a Comprehensive Human-Centred Evaluation Framework for Explainable AI
Ivania Donoso-Guzm\'an, Jeroen Ooge, Denis Parra, Katrien Verbert

TL;DR
This paper proposes a comprehensive, human-centred evaluation framework for explainable AI, adapting a user-centric approach from recommender systems to holistically assess explanation quality and user experience.
Contribution
It introduces a novel evaluation framework that categorizes explanation properties and metrics, aiming to standardize human-centred XAI evaluation methods.
Findings
Framework integrates explanation aspects and properties.
Categorizes metrics measuring explanation effects.
Aims to standardize human-centred evaluation procedures.
Abstract
While research on explainable AI (XAI) is booming and explanation techniques have proven promising in many application domains, standardised human-centred evaluation procedures are still missing. In addition, current evaluation procedures do not assess XAI methods holistically in the sense that they do not treat explanations' effects on humans as a complex user experience. To tackle this challenge, we propose to adapt the User-Centric Evaluation Framework used in recommender systems: we integrate explanation aspects, summarise explanation properties, indicate relations between them, and categorise metrics that measure these properties. With this comprehensive evaluation framework, we hope to contribute to the human-centred standardisation of XAI evaluation.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) · Machine Learning in Healthcare · Topic Modeling
