Help or Hinder? Evaluating the Impact of Fairness Metrics and Algorithms in Visualizations for Consensus Ranking
Hilson Shrestha, Kathleen Cachel, Mallak Alkhathlan, Elke, Rundensteiner, and Lane Harrison

TL;DR
This study evaluates how visualizing fairness metrics and algorithms in consensus ranking systems influences user decisions, showing that such features promote fairness alignment and reduce manual effort in decision-making.
Contribution
The paper provides empirical evidence on the effectiveness of fairness-oriented visualizations and algorithms in human-in-the-loop consensus ranking systems.
Findings
Fairness features guide users towards fairer decisions.
Fairness support reduces manual ranking adjustments.
Participants preferred fairness-aware systems for decision consistency.
Abstract
For applications where multiple stakeholders provide recommendations, a fair consensus ranking must not only ensure that the preferences of rankers are well represented, but must also mitigate disadvantages among socio-demographic groups in the final result. However, there is little empirical guidance on the value or challenges of visualizing and integrating fairness metrics and algorithms into human-in-the-loop systems to aid decision-makers. In this work, we design a study to analyze the effectiveness of integrating such fairness metrics-based visualization and algorithms. We explore this through a task-based crowdsourced experiment comparing an interactive visualization system for constructing consensus rankings, ConsensusFuse, with a similar system that includes visual encodings of fairness metrics and fair-rank generation algorithms, FairFuse. We analyze the measure of fairness,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
