TL;DR
This study evaluates the accuracy of G4-like composite ab initio methods in predicting vibrational harmonic frequencies, demonstrating their high accuracy and cost-effectiveness compared to traditional methods, especially with ANO basis sets.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive validation of G4-like composite methods for vibrational frequencies against experimental data, highlighting their advantages with ANO basis sets.
Findings
G4-T is three times more accurate than CCSD(T)/def2-TZVP.
G4-T_ano is twice as accurate as CCSD(T)/ano-pVTZ.
Composite schemes with ANO basis sets achieve ~5 cm^{-1} RMS deviation.
Abstract
Minimally empirical G4-like composite wavefunction theories [E. Semidalas and J. M. L. Martin, \textit{J. Chem. Theory Comput.} {\bf 16}, 4238-4255 and 7507-7524 (2020)] trained against the large and chemically diverse GMTKN55 benchmark suite have demonstrated both accuracy and cost-effectiveness in predicting thermochemistry, barrier heights, and noncovalent interaction energies. Here, we assess the spectroscopic accuracy of top-performing methods: G4-\textit{n}, cc-G4-\textit{n}, and G4-\textit{n}-F12, and validate them against explicitly correlated coupled cluster CCSD(T*)(F12*) harmonic vibrational frequencies and experimental data from the HFREQ2014 dataset, of small first- and second-row polyatomics. G4-T is three times more accurate than plain CCSD(T)/def2-TZVP, while G4-T is two times superior to CCSD(T)/ano-pVTZ. Combining CCSD(T)/ano-pVTZ with MP2-F12 in a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
