Going Deep and Going Wide: Counting Logic and Homomorphism Indistinguishability over Graphs of Bounded Treedepth and Treewidth
Eva Fluck, Tim Seppelt, Gian Luca Spitzer

TL;DR
This paper explores the expressive power of counting logic on graphs, providing new characterizations and separations of graph classes based on homomorphism indistinguishability, treedepth, and treewidth, with implications for logic and graph theory.
Contribution
It offers an elementary proof of a key characterization of counting logic and establishes a separation between graph classes related to treedepth and treewidth.
Findings
Reproves Dawar, Jakl, and Reggio's characterization using elementary techniques.
Provides a graph-theoretic analysis separating certain graph classes.
Proves that the class of graphs with bounded treedepth is homomorphism distinguishing closed.
Abstract
We study the expressive power of first-order logic with counting quantifiers, especially the -variable and quantifier-rank- fragment , using homomorphism indistinguishability. Recently, Dawar, Jakl, and Reggio (2021) proved that two graphs satisfy the same -sentences if and only if they are homomorphism indistinguishable over the class of graphs admitting a -pebble forest cover of depth . Their proof builds on the categorical framework of game comonads developed by Abramsky, Dawar, and Wang (2017). We reprove their result using elementary techniques inspired by Dvo\v{r}\'ak (2010). Using these techniques we also give a characterisation of guarded counting logic. Our main focus, however, is to provide a graph theoretic analysis of the graph class . This allows us to separate from the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
