Invariants of Quadratic Forms and applications in Design Theory
Oliver W. Gnilke, Padraig O Cathain, Oktay Olmez, Guillermo Nunez, Ponasso

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that linear algebraic methods, similar to Jordan Canonical Form, can be used to analyze quadratic forms and derive non-existence results in design theory, simplifying previous approaches.
Contribution
It introduces a purely linear-algebraic approach to study invariants of quadratic forms and applies it to problems in design theory, including incidence matrix decomposition.
Findings
Linear algebraic methods are sufficient for analyzing quadratic form invariants.
Simplified proofs of non-existence results in design theory.
New application to decomposing incidence matrices of symmetric designs.
Abstract
The study of regular incidence structures such as projective planes and symmetric block designs is a well established topic in discrete mathematics. Work of Bruck, Ryser and Chowla in the mid-twentieth century applied the Hasse-Minkowski local-global theory for quadratic forms to derive non-existence results for certain design parameters. Several combinatorialists have provided alternative proofs of this result, replacing conceptual arguments with algorithmic ones. In this paper, we show that the methods required are purely linear-algebraic in nature and are no more difficult conceptually than the theory of the Jordan Canonical Form. Computationally, they are rather easier. We conclude with some classical and recent applications to design theory, including a novel application to the decomposition of incidence matrices of symmetric designs.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicsgraph theory and CDMA systems · Quasicrystal Structures and Properties · Coding theory and cryptography
