Comparing pion production in transport simulations of heavy-ion collisions at $270A$ MeV under controlled conditions
Jun Xu, Hermann Wolter, Maria Colonna, Mircea Dan Cozma, Pawel, Danielewicz, Che Ming Ko, Akira Ono, ManYee Betty Tsang, Ying-Xun Zhang,, Hui-Gan Cheng, Natsumi Ikeno, Rohit Kumar, Jun Su, Hua Zheng, Zhen Zhang,, Lie-Wen Chen, Zhao-Qing Feng, Christoph Hartnack

TL;DR
This study compares various transport models in simulating pion production in Sn+Sn collisions at 270A MeV, highlighting differences due to model types, physics assumptions, and implementation details, and demonstrating convergence under standardized conditions.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison of BUU and QMD transport models under controlled conditions, identifying sources of discrepancies and demonstrating improved convergence with standardized strategies.
Findings
Higher maximum density increases pion yield and reduces $rac{ ext{π}^-}{ ext{π}^+}$ ratio.
More effective Pauli blocking slightly suppresses pion yield and increases the $rac{ ext{π}^-}{ ext{π}^+}$ ratio.
Coulomb force affects the total and high-energy pion yield ratios.
Abstract
Within the TMEP, we present a detailed study of the performance of different transport models in Sn+Sn collisions at MeV, and put particular emphasis on the production of pions and resonances, which have been used as probes of the nuclear symmetry energy. We prescribe a common and rather simple physics model, and follow in detail the results of 4 BUU models and 6 QMD models. The nucleonic evolution of the collision and the nucleonic observables in these codes do not completely converge, but the differences among the codes can be understood as being due to several reasons: the basic differences between BUU and QMD models in the representation of the phase-space distributions, computational differences in the mean-field evaluation, and differences in the adopted strategies for the Pauli blocking in the collision integrals. For pionic observables, we find that a higher…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
