Kerr-Newman and Electromagnetic acceleration
Paul H. Frampton

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that incorporating spin via the Kerr-Newman metric does not fundamentally alter previous conclusions about charged primordial black holes, particularly regarding Coulomb repulsion and naked singularities.
Contribution
It shows that the Kerr-Newman metric confirms earlier findings with Reissner-Nordstrom metric, indicating spin is not a crucial factor in these properties.
Findings
Kerr-Newman metric retains principal properties of charged black holes.
Coulomb repulsion dominance requires super-extremality.
Presence of naked singularities persists with spin inclusion.
Abstract
Previous discussions of charged dark matter neglected PBH spin and employed the Reissner-Nordstrom metric. In Nature we expect the PBHs to possess spin which require use of the technically more challenging Kerr-Newman metric. It is shown that the use of K-N metric retains the principal properties already obtained using the R-N metric, in particular the dominance of Coulomb repulsion requires super-extremality and the presence of naked singularities. In this sense, the spin of the PBHs is not an essential complication.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena · Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics · Relativity and Gravitational Theory
