Mathematical Artifacts Have Politics: The Journey from Examples to Embedded Ethics
Dennis M\"uller, Maurice Chiodo

TL;DR
This paper explores how mathematical artifacts embody political values, arguing that all such artifacts have politics and discussing implications for embedding ethics in mathematical education.
Contribution
It extends the concept that artifacts have politics into mathematics, providing examples and an argument that all mathematical artifacts possess political dimensions.
Findings
Mathematical artifacts can embody political values.
Acknowledging politics in math artifacts can improve ethical education.
Designing math exercises with political awareness enhances ethical understanding.
Abstract
We extend Langdon Winner's idea that artifacts have politics into the realm of mathematics. To do so, we first provide a list of examples showing the existence of mathematical artifacts that have politics. In the second step, we provide an argument that shows that all mathematical artifacts have politics. We conclude by showing the implications for embedding ethics into mathematical curricula. We show how acknowledging that mathematical artifacts have politics can help mathematicians design better exercises for their mathematics students.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPragmatism in Philosophy and Education
