Classification of lung cancer subtypes on CT images with synthetic pathological priors

TL;DR

This paper introduces SGHF-Net, a novel deep learning model that leverages synthetic pathological priors derived from CT images to improve lung cancer subtype classification accuracy.

Contribution

The paper proposes a self-generating hybrid feature network that synthesizes pathological features from CT images and fuses them with radiological features for enhanced classification.

Findings

Significant accuracy improvements over state-of-the-art models.

Effective cross-modality feature synthesis from CT to pathology.

Robust performance on multi-center dataset with 829 cases.

Abstract

The accurate diagnosis on pathological subtypes for lung cancer is of significant importance for the follow-up treatments and prognosis managements. In this paper, we propose self-generating hybrid feature network (SGHF-Net) for accurately classifying lung cancer subtypes on computed tomography (CT) images. Inspired by studies stating that cross-scale associations exist in the image patterns between the same case's CT images and its pathological images, we innovatively developed a pathological feature synthetic module (PFSM), which quantitatively maps cross-modality associations through deep neural networks, to derive the "gold standard" information contained in the corresponding pathological images from CT images. Additionally, we designed a radiological feature extraction module (RFEM) to directly acquire CT image information and integrated it with the pathological priors under an effective feature fusion framework, enabling the entire classification model to generate more indicative and specific pathologically related features and eventually output more accurate predictions. The superiority of the proposed model lies in its ability to self-generate hybrid features that contain multi-modality image information based on a single-modality input. To evaluate the effectiveness, adaptability, and generalization ability of our model, we performed extensive experiments on a large-scale multi-center dataset (i.e., 829 cases from three hospitals) to compare our model and a series of state-of-the-art (SOTA) classification models. The experimental results demonstrated the superiority of our model for lung cancer subtypes classification with significant accuracy improvements in terms of accuracy (ACC), area under the curve (AUC), and F1 score.