Global evidence on the income elasticity of willingness to pay, relative price changes and public natural capital values
Moritz A. Drupp, Zachary M. Turk, Ben Groom, Jonas Heckenhahn

TL;DR
This paper provides empirical estimates of income elasticity of willingness to pay for ecosystem services, revealing a typical elasticity of 0.6 and suggesting significant upward adjustments in natural capital valuation.
Contribution
It offers the first comprehensive global meta-analysis of contingent valuation studies to quantify income elasticities of ecosystem services for policy and valuation adjustments.
Findings
Income elasticity of WTP is approximately 0.6.
Relative price change of ecosystem services is about 1.7% annually.
Natural capital valuation should be increased by 40% to 97%.
Abstract
While the global economy continues to grow, ecosystem services tend to stagnate or decline. Economic theory has shown how such shifts in relative scarcities can be reflected in project appraisal and accounting, but empirical evidence has been sparse to put theory into practice. To estimate relative price changes in ecosystem services to be used for making such adjustments, we perform a global meta-analysis of contingent valuation studies to derive income elasticities of marginal willingness to pay (WTP) for ecosystem services to proxy the degree of limited substitutability. Based on 735 income-WTP pairs from 396 studies, we find an income elasticity of WTP of around 0.6. Combined with good-specific growth rates, we estimate relative price change of ecosystem services of around 1.7 percent per year. In an application to natural capital valuation of forest ecosystem services by the World…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEconomic and Environmental Valuation · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Environmental Conservation and Management
