Hadronic vacuum polarization: comparing lattice QCD and data-driven results in systematically improvable ways

TL;DR

This paper introduces a framework to compare and reconcile lattice QCD and data-driven results for hadronic vacuum polarization, revealing that a ~5% modification in the rho peak can align the two approaches across key observables.

Contribution

The paper develops a systematic method to analyze tensions between lattice QCD and data-driven HVP results, enabling potential combination of both approaches through controlled modifications.

Findings

Results can be reconciled by increasing the rho peak contribution by about 5%.

The required modification exceeds current experimental uncertainties on the R-ratio.

The framework accounts for all uncertainties and correlations in the comparison.

Abstract

The precision with which hadronic vacuum polarization (HVP) is obtained determines how accurately important observables, such as the muon anomalous magnetic moment, a_\mu, or the low-energy running of the electromagnetic coupling, \alpha, are predicted. The two most precise approaches for determining HVP are: dispersive relations combined with e+e- to hadrons cross-section data, and lattice QCD. However, the results obtained in these two approaches display significant tensions, whose origins are not understood. Here we present a framework that sheds light on this issue and, if the two approaches can be reconciled, allows them to be combined. Via this framework, we test the hypothesis that the tensions can be explained by modifying the R-ratio in different intervals of center-of-mass energy sqrt(s). As ingredients, we consider observables that have been precisely determined in both approaches. These are the leading hadronic contributions to a_\mu, to the so-called intermediate window observable and to the running of \alpha between spacelike virtualities 1GeV^2 and 10GeV^2 (for which only a preliminary lattice result exists). Our tests take into account all uncertainties and correlations, as well as uncertainties on uncertainties in the lattice results. Among our findings, the most striking is that results obtained in the two approaches can be made to agree for all three observables by modifying the \rho peak in the experimental spectrum. In particular, we find that this requires a common ~5\% increase in the contributions of the peak to each of the three observables. This finding is robust against the presence or absence of one of the constraining observables. However, such an increase is much larger than the uncertainties on the measured R-ratio. We also discuss a variety of generalizations of the methods used here, as well as the limits in the information that can be extracted...