Toward Improving Predictive Risk Modelling for New Zealand's Child Welfare System Using Clustering Methods
Sahar Barmomanesh, Victor Miranda-Soberanis

TL;DR
This study explores clustering methods to improve predictive risk models for child maltreatment in New Zealand, aiming to identify subgroups and enhance model accuracy for targeted child welfare interventions.
Contribution
It integrates PCA and K-Means clustering to analyze risk factors and evaluate cluster-specific prediction models, addressing gaps in understanding feature interactions and model performance.
Findings
No significant performance difference across clusters.
Models performed slightly better for younger children.
Further research needed to confirm findings.
Abstract
The combination of clinical judgement and predictive risk models crucially assist social workers to segregate children at risk of maltreatment and decide when authorities should intervene. Predictive risk modelling to address this matter has been initiated by several governmental welfare authorities worldwide involving administrative data and machine learning algorithms. While previous studies have investigated risk factors relating to child maltreatment, several gaps remain as to understanding how such risk factors interact and whether predictive risk models perform differently for children with different features. By integrating Principal Component Analysis and K-Means clustering, this paper presents initial findings of our work on the identification of such features as well as their potential effect on current risk modelling frameworks. This approach allows examining existent,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsChild Abuse and Trauma
MethodsLogistic Regression
