Measuring income inequality via percentile relativities
Vytaras Brazauskas, Francesca Greselin, and Ricardas Zitikis

TL;DR
This paper introduces three new median-based income inequality indices that are robust to heavily skewed and infinite-mean distributions, improving upon classical mean-based measures like the Gini index.
Contribution
It develops and analyzes three novel median-based inequality indices that address shortcomings of previous measures and are applicable to ultra-heavy tailed income distributions.
Findings
New indices perform well on parametric income distributions
Indices are robust to infinite-mean distributions
Application to European income data demonstrates practical utility
Abstract
"The rich are getting richer" implies that the population income distributions are getting more right skewed and heavily tailed. For such distributions, the mean is not the best measure of the center, but the classical indices of income inequality, including the celebrated Gini index, are all mean-based. In view of this, Professor Gastwirth sounded an alarm back in 2014 by suggesting to incorporate the median into the definition of the Gini index, although noted a few shortcomings of his proposed index. In the present paper we make a further step in the modification of classical indices and, to acknowledge the possibility of differing viewpoints, arrive at three median-based indices of inequality. They avoid the shortcomings of the previous indices and can be used even when populations are ultra heavily tailed, that is, when their first moments are infinite. The new indices are…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsIncome, Poverty, and Inequality
