Combining Proofs for Description Logic and Concrete Domain Reasoning (Technical Report)
Christian Alrabbaa, Franz Baader, Stefan Borgwardt, Patrick Koopmann, and Alisa Kovtunova

TL;DR
This paper develops proof methods for combined Description Logic and concrete domain reasoning, enabling explanations that integrate numerical and logical reasoning in AI ontologies.
Contribution
It introduces reasoning procedures for DLs with concrete domains and shows how to combine their proofs with traditional DL proofs for integrated explanations.
Findings
Proof procedures for DLs with concrete domains are developed.
Integrated proofs combining DL and concrete domain reasoning are demonstrated.
The methods facilitate explainable AI with numerical and logical reasoning.
Abstract
Logic-based approaches to AI have the advantage that their behavior can in principle be explained with the help of proofs of the computed consequences. For ontologies based on Description Logic (DL), we have put this advantage into practice by showing how proofs for consequences derived by DL reasoners can be computed and displayed in a user-friendly way. However, these methods are insufficient in applications where also numerical reasoning is relevant. The present paper considers proofs for DLs extended with concrete domains (CDs) based on the rational numbers, which leave reasoning tractable if integrated into the lightweight DL . Since no implemented DL reasoner supports these CDs, we first develop reasoning procedures for them, and show how they can be combined with reasoning approaches for pure DLs, both for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSemantic Web and Ontologies · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
