Bertlmann's socks from a Viennese perspective

TL;DR

This paper explores the interpretive paradoxes of quantum mechanics, proposing that linking logical and quantum undecidability through observer relationships can resolve longstanding conceptual issues.

Contribution

It introduces a novel interpretive framework connecting logical and quantum undecidability via observer-observed relations, offering a new perspective on quantum paradoxes.

Findings

Identifies the link between logical and quantum undecidability.

Proposes a relational approach to quantum interpretive paradoxes.

Suggests a normative reconciliation of quantum behaviors.

Abstract

Quantum mechanics is a theory that is as effective as it is counterintuitive. While quantum practices operate impeccably, they compel us to embrace enigmatic phenomena like the collapse of the state vector and non-locality, thereby pushing us towards untenable "hypotheses non fingo" stances. However, a century after its inception, we are presented with a promising interpretive key, intimated by Wheeler as early as 1974. The interpretative paradoxes of this theory might be resolved if we discern the relationship between logical undecidability and quantum undecidability. It will be demonstrated how both are intricately linked to an observer/observed relational issue, and how the idiosyncratic behaviours of quantum physics can be reconciled with the normative, following this path.