FRBs and magnetar activity statistics
Sergei B. Popov (ICTP)

TL;DR
This paper uses observational data and a simple model to explore whether super-repeating and one-off FRBs originate from the same magnetar population, suggesting they could be different activity stages of magnetars.
Contribution
It proposes a toy model linking FRB repetition patterns to magnetar activity stages, challenging the idea that all FRBs come from a single population.
Findings
Super-repeaters may be identified among known sources.
Intervals between strong FRBs match expected giant flare times.
Active magnetar phase lasts a few thousand years.
Abstract
With simple estimates based on recent observational data and the assumption that among known FRB sources most repeaters with extremely high rates of repetition (super-repeaters) are already identified, we demonstrate that the hypothesis that super-repeaters and one-off events come from the same population of magnetars is not self-contradictory. In this toy model, the super-repeater stage has a duration of about a few years and the period when one-off events are mostly emitted corresponds to the active life of a magnetar few~years. Intervals between strong events (observed as one-off FRBs) from the same source are ~years, corresponding to the expected time interval between giant flares.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research · Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae · High-pressure geophysics and materials
