The laws of nature and the problems of modern cosmology
Yves Gaspar, Pawel Tambor

TL;DR
This paper explores the philosophical and scientific implications of the laws of nature in modern cosmology, emphasizing their dynamic nature and the need for revised concepts to address unresolved cosmological problems.
Contribution
It introduces philosophical perspectives and recent theoretical proposals, like FLOTE and the nomological machine, to analyze the nature and status of laws in cosmology.
Findings
Traditional laws may be formally unpredictable or uncomputable.
Revising the concept of natural laws can address unresolved cosmological issues.
Philosophical approaches provide new insights into the nature of time and causality.
Abstract
The notion that nature is subject to laws is exciting from many different viewpoints. This paper is based on the context of modern cosmology and presents a more philosophical discussion. It will list the significant interdisciplinary implications generated by various aspects of the contemporary scientific discussion about the status of laws of nature, especially their dynamic nature. Recent work highlights how multiple aspects of the observed universe still lack explanation and that several problems of standard cosmology still form the object of debate. Considering these issues, several proposals have been made that entail a revision of the concept of the law of nature, according to which the nature of time and of the relation between causality and natural laws ought to be reconsidered using approaches or viewpoints which point to philosophical issues. We argue that Tim Maudlin's…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
