Hamiltonian Analysis of $f(Q)$ Gravity and the Failure of the Dirac-Bergmann Algorithm for Teleparallel Theories of Gravity

TL;DR

This paper critically examines the Hamiltonian analysis of $f(Q)$ gravity, revealing the failure of the Dirac-Bergmann algorithm in this context and proposing alternative methods to determine the true degrees of freedom.

Contribution

It demonstrates the failure of the Dirac-Bergmann algorithm for $f(Q)$ gravity and related theories, and suggests a more reliable approach to count physical degrees of freedom.

Findings

Dirac-Bergmann algorithm fails for $f(Q)$ gravity

Previous degree of freedom count (eight) is incorrect

Upper bound on degrees of freedom is seven

Abstract

In recent years, $f(Q)$ gravity has enjoyed considerable attention in the literature and important results have been obtained. However, the question of how many physical degrees of freedom the theory propagates -- and how this number may depend on the form of the function $f$ -- has not been answered satisfactorily. In this article we show that a Hamiltonian analysis based on the Dirac-Bergmann algorithm -- one of the standard methods to address this type of question -- fails. We isolate the source of the failure, show that other commonly considered teleparallel theories of gravity are affected by the same problem, and we point out that the number of degrees of freedom obtained in Phys. Rev. D 106 no. 4, (2022) by K. Hu, T. Katsuragawa, and T. Qui (namely eight), based on the Dirac-Bergmann algorithm, is wrong. Using a different approach, we show that the upper bound on the degrees of freedom is seven. Finally, we propose a more promising strategy for settling this important question.