A note on quadratic forms
Fabian Hebestreit, Achim Krause, Maxime Ramzi

TL;DR
This paper investigates quadratic forms over field extensions, showing that certain bilinear maps are genuine quadratic forms if and only if the extension is formally unramified, simplifying the axioms in specific cases.
Contribution
It establishes a criterion linking quadratic forms over extensions to formal unramifiedness, revealing that some axioms are unnecessary over finite and number fields.
Findings
All such maps are quadratic forms over $L$ if and only if $L/K$ is formally unramified.
Over finite and number fields, one axiom in the standard quadratic form definition is redundant.
Abstract
For a field extension we consider maps that are quadratic over but whose polarisation is only bilinear over . Our main result is that all such are automatically quadratic forms over in the usual sense if and only if is formally unramified. In particular, this shows that over finite and number fields, one of the axioms in the standard definition of quadratic forms is superfluous.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Meromorphic and Entire Functions
