Digging a little deeper: characterising three new extreme ULX candidates

TL;DR

This study identifies and characterizes three new ultraluminous X-ray source candidates, analyzing their properties to assess their potential as pulsating ULXs, and discusses the effectiveness of different identification methods.

Contribution

The paper introduces a new selection criterion for ULX candidates based on luminosity and brightness, and provides detailed analysis of three promising sources using archival data.

Findings

One candidate shows spectral hardness similar to known PULXs.

Another candidate is associated with a dwarf galaxy but has limited data.

The third candidate is a variable, spectrally hard X-ray source in NGC 3631.

Abstract

A prime motivation for compiling catalogues of any celestial X-ray source is to increase our numbers of rare sub-classes. In this work we take a recent multi-mission catalogue of ultraluminous X-ray sources (ULXs) and look for hitherto poorly-studied ULX candidates that are luminous ($L_{\rm X} \geq 10^{40} \rm ~erg~s^{-1}$), bright ($f_{\rm X} \geq 5 \times 10^{-13} \rm ~erg~cm~s^{-1}$) and have archival XMM-Newton data. We speculate that this luminosity regime may be ideal for identifying new pulsating ULXs (PULXs), given that the majority of known PULXs reach similar high luminosities. We find three sources that match our criteria, and study them using archival data. We find 4XMM J165251.5-591503 to possess a bright and variable Galactic optical/IR counterpart, and so conclude it is very likely to be a foreground interloper. 4XMM J091948.8-121429 does appear an excellent ULX candidate associated with the dwarf irregular galaxy PGC 26378, but has only one detection to date with low data quality. The best dataset belongs to 4XMM J112054.3+531040 which we find to be a moderately variable, spectrally hard ($\Gamma \approx 1.4$) X-ray source located in a spiral arm of NGC 3631. Its spectral hardness is similar to known PULXs, but no pulsations are detected by accelerated pulsation searches in the available data. We discuss whether other missions provide objects for similar studies, and compare this method to others suggested for identifying good PULX candidates.