Geometric Scaling of the Current-Phase Relation of Niobium Nano-Bridge Junctions
Yue Wang, Lei Chen, Yinping Pan, Denghui Zhang, Shujie Yu, Guangting, Wu, Xiaoyu Liu, Ling Wu, Weifeng Shi, Guofeng Zhang, Lu Zhang, Wei Peng, Jie, Ren, Zhen Wang

TL;DR
This study investigates how the current-phase relation of niobium nano-bridge Josephson junctions varies with geometry, showing that their CPR can be tuned by geometric dimensions and providing a scaling model for circuit design.
Contribution
It offers a quantitative description of CPR deviations in NBJs based on geometric skewness and presents a scaling behavior model for future superconducting circuit design.
Findings
CPRs of NBJs can be described by skewness {}{} and geometric dimensions.
Measured and calculated skewness {}{} dependencies are consistent.
Scaling behavior of {}{} versus critical current I_0 is established.
Abstract
The nano-bridge junction (NBJ) is a type of Josephson junction that is advantageous for the miniaturization of superconducting circuits. However, the current-phase relation (CPR) of the NBJ usually deviates from a sinusoidal function which has been explained by a simplified model with correlation only to its effective length. Here, we investigated both measured and calculated CPRs of niobium NBJs of a cuboidal shape with a three-dimensional bank structure. From a sine-wave to a saw-tooth-like form, we showed that deviated CPRs of NBJs can be described quantitatively by its skewness {\Delta}{\theta}. Furthermore, the measured dependency of {\Delta}{\theta} on the critical current {I_0} from 108 NBJs turned out to be consistent with the calculated ones derived from the change in geometric dimensions. It suggested that the CPRs of NBJs can be tuned by their geometric dimensions. In…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
