Forgetting 1-Limited Automata
Giovanni Pighizzini, Luca Prigioniero

TL;DR
This paper introduces forgetting 1-limited automata, a new model that characterizes regular languages and explores the size complexity of converting these automata into other models, revealing exponential bounds and size disparities.
Contribution
The paper defines forgetting 1-limited automata and analyzes their size complexity when converting to one-way automata, establishing optimal bounds and size relationships with two-way automata.
Findings
Optimal bounds for automata conversion sizes
Existence of languages with exponential size gaps
Forgetting automata characterize regular languages
Abstract
We introduce and investigate forgetting 1-limited automata, which are single-tape Turing machines that, when visiting a cell for the first time, replace the input symbol in it by a fixed symbol, so forgetting the original contents. These devices have the same computational power as finite automata, namely they characterize the class of regular languages. We study the cost in size of the conversions of forgetting 1-limited automata, in both nondeterministic and deterministic cases, into equivalent one-way nondeterministic and deterministic automata, providing optimal bounds in terms of exponential or superpolynomial functions. We also discuss the size relationships with two-way finite automata. In this respect, we prove the existence of a language for which forgetting 1-limited automata are exponentially larger than equivalent minimal deterministic two-way automata.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicssemigroups and automata theory · Machine Learning and Algorithms · DNA and Biological Computing
