Pathloss-based non-Line-of-Sight Identification in an Indoor Environment: An Experimental Study

TL;DR

This experimental study compares pathloss-based and machine learning methods for classifying LOS/NLOS conditions indoors, achieving around 88% accuracy, and highlights the effectiveness of simple hypothesis testing.

Contribution

The paper introduces a novel dataset of pathloss measurements for indoor LOS/NLOS classification and compares traditional hypothesis testing with machine learning approaches.

Findings

RBF-SVM achieved up to 88.24% accuracy at low SNR.

Pathloss-based hypothesis test performs comparably to ML classifiers.

Machine learning methods only slightly outperform traditional hypothesis testing.

Abstract

This paper reports the findings of an experimental study on the problem of line-of-sight (LOS)/non-line-of-sight (NLOS) classification in an indoor environment. Specifically, we deploy a pair of NI 2901 USRP software-defined radios (SDR) in a large hall. The transmit SDR emits an unmodulated tone of frequency 10 KHz, on a center frequency of 2.4 GHz, using three different signal-to-noise ratios (SNR). The receive SDR constructs a dataset of pathloss measurements from the received signal as it moves across 15 equi-spaced positions on a 1D grid (for both LOS and NLOS scenarios). We utilize our custom dataset to estimate the pathloss parameters (i.e., pathloss exponent) using the least-squares method, and later, utilize the parameterized pathloss model to construct a binary hypothesis test for NLOS identification. Further, noting that the pathloss measurements slightly deviate from Gaussian distribution, we feed our custom dataset to four machine learning (ML) algorithms, i.e., linear support vector machine (SVM) and radial basis function SVM (RBF-SVM), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA), and logistic regression (LR). It turns out that the performance of the ML algorithms is only slightly superior to the Neyman-Pearson-based binary hypothesis test (BHT). That is, the RBF-SVM classifier (the best performing ML classifier) and the BHT achieve a maximum accuracy of 88.24% and 87.46% for low SNR, 83.91% and 81.21% for medium SNR, and 87.38% and 86.65% for high SNR.