Evolution of the Lyman-{\alpha} emitting fraction and UV properties of lensed star-forming galaxies between 2.9 < z < 6.7
Ilias Goovaerts, Roser Pello, Tran Thi Thai, Pham Tuan-Anh, Johan, Richard, Ad\'ela\"ide Claeyssens, Emile Carinos, Geoffroy de la Vieuville,, and Jorryt Matthee

TL;DR
This study analyzes the evolution of Lyman-alpha emitter fractions and UV properties of faint, lensed star-forming galaxies from redshift 2.9 to 6.7, revealing insights into reionisation and galaxy populations.
Contribution
It provides the largest sample of faint galaxies to date, examining the relationship between Lyman-alpha emission, UV brightness, and redshift, with new findings on galaxy populations in reionised bubbles.
Findings
Lyman-alpha emitter fraction decreases above z=6, indicating increasing IGM neutrality.
UV-brighter galaxies have higher Lyman-alpha fractions, especially at higher redshifts.
Fainter galaxies show trends of high star formation and low dust content, with stronger LAEs being fainter and having steeper UV slopes.
Abstract
Faint galaxies are theorised to have played a major role in reionising the Universe. Their properties as well as the Lyman-{\alpha} emitter fraction, could provide useful insight into this epoch. We use four galaxy clusters from the Lensed Lyman-alpha MUSE Arcs Sample (LLAMAS) which also have deep HST photometry to select a population of intrinsically faint Lyman Break Galaxies (LBGs) and Lyman-alpha Emitters (LAEs). We study the interrelation of these two populations, their properties, and the fraction of LBGs that display Lyman-alpha emission. The use of lensing clusters allows us to access an intrinsically faint population, the largest sample collected for this purpose: 263 LAEs and 972 LBGs between redshifts of 2.9 and 6.7, Lyman-alpha luminosities between 39.5 < log(L)(erg/s) < 42 and absolute UV magnitudes between -22 < M1500 < -12. We find a redshift evolution of the Lyman-alpha…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
