Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback
Stephen Casper, Xander Davies, Claudia Shi, Thomas Krendl Gilbert,, J\'er\'emy Scheurer, Javier Rando, Rachel Freedman, Tomasz Korbak, David, Lindner, Pedro Freire, Tony Wang, Samuel Marks, Charbel-Rapha\"el Segerie,, Micah Carroll, Andi Peng, Phillip Christoffersen

TL;DR
This paper surveys the open problems and fundamental limitations of reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), emphasizing the need for improved oversight and complementary techniques to develop safer AI systems.
Contribution
It systematically analyzes RLHF's flaws, reviews methods to enhance it, and proposes standards for auditing and societal oversight.
Findings
RLHF has significant limitations that impact AI safety.
Current techniques to understand and improve RLHF are discussed.
Standards for auditing RLHF systems are proposed.
Abstract
Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) is a technique for training AI systems to align with human goals. RLHF has emerged as the central method used to finetune state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs). Despite this popularity, there has been relatively little public work systematizing its flaws. In this paper, we (1) survey open problems and fundamental limitations of RLHF and related methods; (2) overview techniques to understand, improve, and complement RLHF in practice; and (3) propose auditing and disclosure standards to improve societal oversight of RLHF systems. Our work emphasizes the limitations of RLHF and highlights the importance of a multi-faceted approach to the development of safer AI systems.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSoftware Reliability and Analysis Research
MethodsALIGN
