RAI Guidelines: Method for Generating Responsible AI Guidelines Grounded in Regulations and Usable by (Non-)Technical Roles
Marios Constantinides, Edyta Bogucka, Daniele Quercia, Susanna Kallio,, Mohammad Tahaei

TL;DR
This paper presents a four-step method to generate responsible AI guidelines that are grounded in regulations and usable by diverse roles, aiming to promote ethical AI development across organizations.
Contribution
It introduces a systematic approach to create responsible AI guidelines grounded in regulation and applicable to various roles, validated through a user study.
Findings
Guidelines are grounded in current regulations.
Guidelines are usable across different roles.
Encourages early-stage ethical reflection.
Abstract
Many guidelines for responsible AI have been suggested to help AI practitioners in the development of ethical and responsible AI systems. However, these guidelines are often neither grounded in regulation nor usable by different roles, from developers to decision makers. To bridge this gap, we developed a four-step method to generate a list of responsible AI guidelines; these steps are: (1) manual coding of 17 papers on responsible AI; (2) compiling an initial catalog of responsible AI guidelines; (3) refining the catalog through interviews and expert panels; and (4) finalizing the catalog. To evaluate the resulting 22 guidelines, we incorporated them into an interactive tool and assessed them in a user study with 14 AI researchers, engineers, designers, and managers from a large technology company. Through interviews with these practitioners, we found that the guidelines were grounded…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI
