Test of $^{116}$CdWO$_4$ and Li$_2$MoO$_4$ scintillating bolometers in the CROSS underground facility with upgraded detector suspension
A. Ahmine, I.C. Bandac, A.S. Barabash, V. Berest, L. Berg\'e, J.M., Calvo-Mozota, P. Carniti, M. Chapellier, I. Dafinei, F.A. Danevich, T. Dixon,, L. Dumoulin, F. Ferri, A. Giuliani, C. Gotti, P. Gras, D.L. Helis, A. Ianni,, L. Imbert, H. Khalife, V.V. Kobychev, S.I. Konovalov

TL;DR
This study tests upgraded scintillating bolometers based on 116CdWO4 and Li2MoO4 crystals in a low-background underground setup, achieving high energy resolution and improved noise performance for potential use in next-generation double-beta decay experiments.
Contribution
The paper reports the successful implementation of a new detector suspension and noise reduction techniques, demonstrating enhanced performance of scintillating bolometers for rare event detection.
Findings
Achieved 6 keV FWHM energy resolution at 2.6 MeV gamma energy.
Improved noise resolution of the CWO-enr detector by 2 keV, and Ge optical bolometer by a factor of 2 to 100 eV.
Demonstrated high particle identification efficiency despite low scintillation efficiency of LMO.
Abstract
In preparation to the CROSS decay experiment, we installed a new detector suspension with magnetic dumping inside a pulse-tube cryostat of a dedicated low-background facility at the LSC (Spain). The suspension was tested with two scintillating bolometers based on large-volume 116CdWO4 (CWO-enr) and Li2MoO4 (LMO) crystals. The former, a reference device, was used for testing new noise conditions and for comparing bolometric performance of an advanced Li2MoO4 crystal developed in the framework of the CLYMENE project, in view of next-generation double-beta decay experiments like CUPID. We cooled down detectors to 15 mK and achieved high performance for all tested devices. In particular both CWO-enr and LMO bolometers demonstrated the energy resolution of 6 keV FWHM for the 2.6 MeV gamma quanta, among the best for thermal detectors based on such compounds. The baseline noise…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
