Fact-Checking of AI-Generated Reports
Razi Mahmood, Diego Machado Reyes, Ge Wang, Mannudeep Kalra, and Pingkun Yan

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel fact-checking method for AI-generated radiology reports by training an examiner to differentiate real from fake sentences based on associated images, enhancing report reliability.
Contribution
The paper presents a new dataset and a learning-based examiner that verifies AI-generated reports by associating sentences with images to detect false findings.
Findings
Successfully created a dataset of fake reports for training.
The examiner accurately detects fake sentences in reports.
The method improves the reliability of AI-generated radiology reports.
Abstract
With advances in generative artificial intelligence (AI), it is now possible to produce realistic-looking automated reports for preliminary reads of radiology images. This can expedite clinical workflows, improve accuracy and reduce overall costs. However, it is also well-known that such models often hallucinate, leading to false findings in the generated reports. In this paper, we propose a new method of fact-checking of AI-generated reports using their associated images. Specifically, the developed examiner differentiates real and fake sentences in reports by learning the association between an image and sentences describing real or potentially fake findings. To train such an examiner, we first created a new dataset of fake reports by perturbing the findings in the original ground truth radiology reports associated with images. Text encodings of real and fake sentences drawn from…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTopic Modeling · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
