AI4GCC - Team: Below Sea Level: Critiques and Improvements
Bram Renting, Phillip Wozny, Robert Loftin, Claudia Wieners, Erman, Acar

TL;DR
This paper critically analyzes the RICE-N climate-economy model, identifying key issues and proposing improvements to enhance its policy relevance and realism in simulating climate change impacts.
Contribution
It offers a detailed critique of RICE-N, highlights common IAM limitations, and suggests specific modifications to improve model accuracy and policy guidance.
Findings
Identified action masking and irrelevant actions in RICE-N
Proposed use of tariff revenue and penalization of overproduction
Highlighted overly optimistic damage and unrealistic abatement functions
Abstract
We present a critical analysis of the simulation framework RICE-N, an integrated assessment model (IAM) for evaluating the impacts of climate change on the economy. We identify key issues with RICE-N, including action masking and irrelevant actions, and suggest improvements such as utilizing tariff revenue and penalizing overproduction. We also critically engage with features of IAMs in general, namely overly optimistic damage functions and unrealistic abatement cost functions. Our findings contribute to the ongoing efforts to further develop the RICE-N framework in an effort to improve the simulation, making it more useful as an inspiration for policymakers.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsClimate Change Policy and Economics · Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth · Economic Policies and Impacts
