Orbital Period Changes for Fourteen Novae and the Critical Failures of the Predictions of Standard Theories, the Hibernation Model, and the Magnetic Braking Model
Bradley E. Schaefer (Louisiana State Univ.)

TL;DR
This study measures orbital period changes in 14 novae and finds that existing theories like the standard, hibernation, and magnetic braking models fail to accurately predict these changes, indicating unknown mechanisms are at play.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive observational test revealing the failures of current models in explaining nova orbital period variations.
Findings
Standard theory fails for novae with negative $\Delta P$.
Hibernation model is refuted due to insufficient $\Delta P$.
Magnetic braking model predictions are off by orders of magnitude.
Abstract
The evolution of novae and Cataclysmic Variables (CVs) is driven by changes in the binary orbital periods. In a direct and critical test for various evolution models and their physical mechanisms, I measure the sudden changes in the period () across 14 nova eruptions and I measure the steady period change during quiescence () for 20 inter-eruption intervals. The standard theory for is dominated by the mechanism of mass loss, and this fails completely for the five novae with negative values, and it fails to permit the for U Sco eruptions to change by one order-of-magnitude from eruption-to-eruption. The Hibernation Model of evolution is refuted because all the measures are orders of magnitude too small to cause any significant drop in accretion luminosity, and indeed, near half of the nova have negative as the opposite of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations
