Photometric calibration of the Stellar Abundance and Galactic Evolution Survey (SAGES): Nanshan One-meter Wide-field Telescope g, r, and i band imaging data
Kai Xiao, Haibo Yuan, Bowen Huang, Shuai Xu, Jie Zheng, Chun Li, Zhou, Fan, Wei Wang, Gang Zhao, Guojie Feng, Xuan Zhang, Jinzhong Liu, Ruoyi Zhang,, Lin Yang, Yu Zhang, Chunhai Bai, Hubiao Niu, Esamdin Ali, Lu Ma

TL;DR
This paper presents a precise photometric calibration method for the SAGES survey, achieving 1-2 mmag uniformity across the sky and constructing a large standard star catalog with high accuracy, improving calibration consistency.
Contribution
The study introduces a combined spectroscopic and photometric calibration approach for the SAGES survey, achieving high-precision uniform calibration and constructing a large standard star catalog.
Findings
Achieved 1-2 mmag calibration uniformity across the sky.
Constructed a catalog of 2.6 million standard stars with 0.01-0.02 mag accuracy.
Discovered time-dependent gain variations and spatial flatness issues in the data.
Abstract
In this paper, a total of approximately 2.6 million dwarfs were constructed as standard stars, with an accuracy of about 0.01-0.02 mag for each band, by combining spectroscopic data from the Large Sky Area Multi-Object Fiber Spectroscopic Telescope Data Release 7, photometric data from the corrected Gaia Early Data Release 3, and photometric metallicities. Using the spectroscopy based stellar color regression method (SCR method) and the photometric-based SCR method (SCR' method), we performed the relative calibration of the Nanshan One-meter Wide-field Telescope imaging data. Based on the corrected Pan-STARRS DR1 photometry, the absolute calibration was also performed. In the photometric calibration process, we analyzed the dependence of the calibration zero points on different images (observation time), different gates of the CCD detector, and different CCD positions. We found that the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
