Hindsight-DICE: Stable Credit Assignment for Deep Reinforcement Learning
Akash Velu, Skanda Vaidyanath, Dilip Arumugam

TL;DR
Hindsight-DICE introduces a stable, efficient method for credit assignment in deep reinforcement learning by adapting importance-sampling techniques, improving learning stability and performance in environments with sparse rewards.
Contribution
The paper develops a novel importance-sampling based approach to stabilize and enhance hindsight policy methods for better credit assignment in complex environments.
Findings
Improved stability in credit assignment tasks.
Enhanced learning efficiency in sparse reward environments.
Broader applicability across diverse reinforcement learning scenarios.
Abstract
Oftentimes, environments for sequential decision-making problems can be quite sparse in the provision of evaluative feedback to guide reinforcement-learning agents. In the extreme case, long trajectories of behavior are merely punctuated with a single terminal feedback signal, leading to a significant temporal delay between the observation of a non-trivial reward and the individual steps of behavior culpable for achieving said reward. Coping with such a credit assignment challenge is one of the hallmark characteristics of reinforcement learning. While prior work has introduced the concept of hindsight policies to develop a theoretically moxtivated method for reweighting on-policy data by impact on achieving the observed trajectory return, we show that these methods experience instabilities which lead to inefficient learning in complex environments. In this work, we adapt existing…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2024 Conference Withdrawn Submission
- Overall, the paper is well organized and easy to follow. - The references in the paper are relatively thorough and shows research effort from the authors. However, I feel that the discussion misses a number of important references related to credit assignment and overstates the novelty of the work (see weaknesses below). The related work section is currently relegated to the appendix, but this should be featured in the main paper in my opinion. - Other than the violation of the Markov reward p
- The main contribution is incremental, essentially applying an existing technique from DualDICE to the existing framework of HCA. There are no new theoretical results or analysis of how the proposed method mitigates the purported instability of HCA. - The experiment results are undermined by the “delayed-reward” setting introduced by the authors. During an episode, rewards are accumulated, and the final sum is presented to the agent only upon episode termination. This makes the reward function
**Originality:** This paper adapts an existing importance-sampling ratio estimation technique for the efficient credit assignment in RL. The application is novel and the proposed method is novel. It is interesting to find that the previous OPE method can be utilized to address the credit assignment issue in online RL. To estimate the ratio, supervised learning is applied to estimate the return predictor, hindsight distribution and hindsight DICE model, which is novel. **Quality:** This paper
The key weaknesses of this paper are: 1. The application of the existing DualDICE in credit assignment is straightforward and simple. It would be better to include technical motivation and more understanding on why it can be applied. 2. It is not easy to follow Equation (2) in the approach section. Why is the Equation (2) feasible? 3. Most of the evaluation scenarios are simple and didactic. It would be great to see results on large scale experiments on some Atari games and small-scaled Go, wh
1. Relative to other areas in RL, there has not been much work since the credit assignment paper in 2019, and its great that this paper revisits the question. 2. I think it is clever to leverage an algorithm from OPE for this alternative use-case. 3. Paper is well-written. 4. The proposed solution is straightforward, and can use off-the-shelf ideas.
1. While it is great that the proposed algorithm leads to good performance, its not clear why the method actually works/improves upon the existing approach to hindsight ratios. The paper says it is improving "stability", but why does this method actually improve stability? Even if there is an intuition for this, it should be mentioned. To give an example, in OPE we could say DICE methods are more stable than importance sampling methods since they do not multiply a string of ratios as a function
This paper addresses the important topic of credit assignment, using a novel approach by drawing inspiration from the OPE literature to improve the stability and therefore the efficiency of HCA. The challenges and solutions are both clearly presented, with empirical results on several simulation tasks. Overall, the idea is novel and the problem the authors tried to solve is important. The way the authors present the paper is in general clear.
The following are my concerns during reading the paper. I'm open to further discussion with the authors and happy to re-evaluate the work if those concerns can be addressed. ### Major: on the evaluation part: 1. [non-standard settings] Many of the environmental designs are revised in the paper, including the maximal time steps. I wonder if the authors can justify the motivation of using non-standard environments. 2. [baseline] Although the author cited [Zhizhou Ren, Ruihan Guo, Yuan Zhou, an
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsReinforcement Learning in Robotics
