Contra multos verbos: On scandals of quantum mechanics
Theodorus Maria Nieuwenhuizen

TL;DR
This paper discusses ongoing philosophical and interpretational issues in quantum mechanics, emphasizing a minimal statistical interpretation based on two decades of research on quantum measurement models.
Contribution
It offers a detailed perspective on quantum mechanics' status, derived from extensive work on dynamical solutions to quantum measurement models, avoiding ontological assumptions.
Findings
Supports a minimal statistical interpretation of quantum mechanics
Provides a dynamical solution framework for quantum measurement
Comments on various interpretations and related concepts
Abstract
In 2008 Nico van Kampen wrote in his letter {\it The scandal of quantum mechanics}: ``The scandal is that there are still many articles, discussions and textbooks, which advertise various interpretations and philosophical profundities." Not much has changed since then, while social media have given a platform for more of what Nico would term ``a scandal''. A detailed viewpoint is presented on the status of quantum mechanics, distilled from two decades of work with Armen Allahverdyan and Roger Balian on the dynamical solution of Curie-Weiss models for quantum measurement. It embodies a certain minimal form of the statistical interpretation and stays clear of ontological connections. Along the way, comments on various related subjects, terms and interpretations are given.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Philosophy and History of Science · Statistical Mechanics and Entropy
