Forking and invariant measures in NIP theories
Anand Pillay, Atticus Stonestrom

TL;DR
This paper presents an example in NIP theories where a formula does not fork over the empty set but has zero measure under all invariant measures, highlighting a distinction in measure behavior.
Contribution
It introduces a specific NIP theory example demonstrating that non-forking does not imply positive measure under invariant measures, contrasting with first-order amenable theories.
Findings
Existence of formulas with non-forking but zero measure
Difference in measure behavior between NIP and amenable theories
Illustration of measure properties in model theory
Abstract
We give an example of an NIP theory in which there is a formula that does not fork over but has measure under any global -invariant Keisler measure, and we show that this cannot occur if is also first-order amenable.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics · Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals · Advanced Topology and Set Theory
