The secretary problem with items arriving according to a random permutation avoiding a pattern of length three

TL;DR

This paper explores the secretary problem under new permutation distributions avoiding specific patterns of length three, revealing varied success probabilities and optimal strategies distinct from the classical uniform case.

Contribution

It introduces and analyzes the secretary problem with items arriving according to permutations avoiding certain length-three patterns, identifying optimal strategies and success probabilities.

Findings

For patterns 231 and 132, success probability is 1/4.

For pattern 123, success probability is 3/4 with a specific strategy.

For patterns 312 and 321, success probability is at least 7/16.

Abstract

In the classical secretary problem, $n$ ranked items arrive one by one, and each item's rank relative to its predecessors is noted. The observer must select or reject each item as it arrives, with the object of selecting the item of highest rank. For $M_n\in\{0,1,\cdots, n-1\}$, let $\mathcal{S}(n,M_n)$ denote the strategy whereby the observer rejects the first $M_n$ items, and then selects the first later-arriving item whose rank is higher than that of any of the first $M_n$ items (if such an item exists). If the ranked items arrive in a uniformly random order, it is well-known that the limiting optimal probability of success is $\frac1e$, which occurs if $M_n\sim\frac ne$. It has been shown that when the ranked items arrive according to certain non-uniform distributions on the set of permutations, $\frac1e$ serves as a lower bound for the optimal probability. There is a fundamental reason for this phenomenon. We consider certain distributions for which that reason does not apply. We begin by noting a cooked-up class of distributions for which $\mathcal{S}(n,M)$ yields the lowest possible probability of success -- namely $\frac1n$, for all $M$. We then consider the uniform distribution over all permutations avoiding a particular pattern of length three. In the case of the pattern 231 or 132, for any choice of $M_n$, the strategy $\mathcal{S}(n,M_n)$ yields the very same probability of success; namely $\frac{n+1}{2(2n-1)}$, which gives a limiting probability of $\frac14$. For the pattern 213, the optimal strategy is obtained for $M\in\{0,1\}$, also yielding a limiting probability of $\frac14$. For the pattern 123, the optimal strategy is obtained for $M=1$, yielding a limiting probability of $\frac34$. For the other two patterns, 312 and 321, an optimal strategy will yield a limiting probability of at least $\frac7{16}$.