Commutative unital rings elementarily equivalent to prescribed product rings
Paola D'Aquino, Angus Macintyre

TL;DR
This paper characterizes when a commutative unital ring is elementarily equivalent to a nontrivial product of rings, using methods inspired by Feferman-Vaught, with applications to residue rings of models of Peano Arithmetic.
Contribution
It provides a converse analysis to Feferman-Vaught's work, identifying conditions for elementary equivalence to product rings in the context of commutative unital rings.
Findings
Criteria for elementary equivalence to product rings.
Application to residue rings of models of Peano Arithmetic.
Extension of Feferman-Vaught methods to commutative rings.
Abstract
The classical work of Feferman Vaught gives a powerful, constructive analysis of definability in (generalized) product structures, and certain associated enriched Boolean structures. %structures in terms of definability in the component structures. Here, by closely related methods, but in the special setting of commutative unital rings, we obtain a kind of converse allowing us to determine in interesting cases, when a commutative unital R is elementarily equivalent to a nontrivial product of a family of commutative unital rings R_i. We use this in the model theoretic analysis of residue rings of models of Peano Arithmetic.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRings, Modules, and Algebras
